Three-Dimensional Alternate Form of Electron

THREE-DIMENSIONAL ALTERNATE FORM OF ELECTRON

Fig. 5

As illustrated on the "Double Rotation" page following "Wave/Particle Duality", it is the dynamic disk (formed by rotation of forces along diameter) that makes the dynamic sphere. The fact that the word dynamic is used so often in this theory is due to the metaparticle's structural dependence on motion, which a number of famous scientists, as well as Metaparticles, have proclaimed to be the ultimate basic reality. (Descartes, Sir Oliver Lodge, and others)

The computer rendition in Fig. 6 traces the pathway of an electron’s objective point by enumeration. Having no hint of such structure, experimentalists long had to abide with ever more ingenious wave theories that began to challenge the very conception of reality.

When a metaparticle electron begins gyroscopic precessional rotation on a second axis, its trackable lesser pole (visible pole) describes the repeating pattern in Fig. 5. Its progress is hard to follow; begin with top arrow and instead of staying with the outer circle, make the curve towards the center and repeat the same thing in reverse on the left side. The point-pole always stays on the surface of the sphere.

(In the computer chart below, No. 1 at center is on closer, front surface of dynamic sphere;No. 33 is on back surface.)

Fig 6

Fig. 6

THE TROUBLE: TWO POLES, ONE INVISIBLE

In view of all the ingenious wave theories invented during the 20th century, many amateur fans of particle physics have wondered at how fanciful and far-out many of them seemed to be -- among them myself. But one can now see how handicapped such theorists actually were. The best analogy comes from poker: They were playing with half a deck. No one had any idea elementary particles contain two poles, and that one of them is invisible. In Figs 5 and 6 is seen a pattern of point-particle movement that is a little tricky to follow even when you know what causes it. Wave-collapse and pilot-wave theoretical physicists never thought they were dealing with particles that sometimes changed into spherical form. No doubt many are still not convinced of it. But as you go through our best attempt at furnishing scientifically acceptable evidence (though it is sorely incomplete), see what you think during the no doubt over-explained examples following. (Double rotation section)

And further, it should be remembered that Quantum Mechanics was supplying correct answers despite the half-deck with too many jokers. Here is the best short explanation we know of:

Probability, if based on data built up from sufficient records of experimentation, can often be of as much value to the needs of physics as though the invisible truth were visible.

Fig. 7
Coincidence?