|
|
|
||
|
By following
the deductive series given here it can be seen how an immaterial causality
creates material particles resulting in an objective universe.
STEP 1: Translocation |
|||
|
|
In a Field of
motion-energy better understood as "being" rather than "existing",
a point is acted upon by a force of separation. In the Field's completely
homogeneous state, this specification of a point constitutes a change,
and no change causing difference is allowed to remain. The force therefore
causes the point to be translocated from the Field substratum into the
spacetime universe, where existence prevails.
If the separating force were now withdrawn, the newly existing point would rejoin and be absorbed into the Field, which its energy value still matches. Therefore the force divides the point (representing 100% F) into two points having 50% F each. |
||
| ·
|
One meaning of "to exist" is to stand out as distinct. Another standard meaning is "having being in time and space". |
||
| · | The term "translocate" is intended to mean disappearing into another energy range without changing position in the cosmos. |
||
| · | Percent is employed to avoid numerical association with quantities of energy intensity, which have not yet been determined for elementary particles in relation to the primal "Field substance". Words which have been applied to that concept include infinite, indeterminable, and zero. |
||
| · | But since the "Dynamic Field" is taken as being changeless and absolute in the conceptual category of substance, this theory considers it to be beyond any state called "material". By the same token the term God would not be restrictively applicable to the Field, which is capitalized to distinguish it from other uses of the word. |
||
|
STEP 2: Energy
Transfer and Polarization |
||
 |
A transfer of energy now occurs in which a percentage of its intensity is taken from point (a) and given to point (b). This is the initial move toward polarization. |
|
|
STEP
3: Diametric
Forces and Rotation |
||
 |
|
|
| · | The separating force can be identified as angular momentum, currently referred to in particle physics as "spin angular momentum". |
|
| · | The events of separation and transfer were necessary to put into effect an interpolar attractive force that is not affected by electromagnetism and other environmental factors, thus providing an enduring structure for elementary particles. No clue has been found defining this force, but our best hypothesis labels it a "unifying force" derived from the original Dynamic Field, acting automatically to restore its homogeneity. This may imply a kinship with gravity. |
|
| · | Rotation begins around a primary axis perpendicular to the diameter. ( A secondary axis enters the picture in Step 6.) |
|
| · | Taken as discrete from increases in charge acquired by an electron from its environment, the basic charge of -1 eV is always maintained and is thus considered an innate attribute of the particle. |
|
|
|
||
| When two points, each composed of maximally real but immaterial "substance", enter spacetime, a fine but important distinction is in order: They do not at that stage constitute "matter". But when they become bonded in the permanent pairing termed divergent balance, with intensities adding up to Field-value, matter has been created. | ||
|
· |
Divergent balance comes about through a combination of the events described in Steps 2 and 3. True, in terms of energy apportionment it is the transfer in Step 2 which first results in a bipolar entity, seemingly quantitatively designed for imbalance. But increasingly we will see that such energy divisions appear to be the crucial factor which permits a single, cyclical universe to encompass widely differing "ranges" of matter that coexist in the same space without interference. |
|
| · | The rationale covering other aspects of divergent balance will be given in the Discussions II section. |
|
|
STEP
5: The
Metaparticle (See
following section, Metaparticle Models for diagrams)
|
||
|
The basic metaparticle comes into existence as a simple fundamental structure equipped for long endurance. The variety of such particles may differ in their attributes, but this theory allows each to be eventually identified by the magnitude of difference in energy between its poles. Only if its rotation were stopped would the unifying force coalesce its two poles into one of F-intensity, thus returning it to the original homogeneous Field. When computer simulations are produced using the
basic bipolar model of electrons, they provide solutions to long-standing
enigmas encountered in electron behavior. This does not mean physics
accepts, even in theory, the metaphysical origin and aspects of particle
creation. But it does imply that some, at least, of the metaparticle's
structural principles introduced in the late seventies
and eighties have since been shown to parallel, in function, principles
now in tentative use by particle physics as developed by their own theorists. |
||
|
· |
The linear diameter gives the particle one dimension. Its "spin-rotation" makes it a two-dimensional object. Constant whirling of a diameter composed of forces provides the dynamic effect of a disk. Secondary rotation of the disk itself, as in Step 6, causes a three-dimensional metaparticle (which can revert to its 2-D form). |
|
| · | The cause of a long-prevailing mystery is the fact that in binary particles their second poles are invisible. This essential second pole permitting rotation has become accepted in principle by science -- mostly through accumulation of implications -- and this only in very recent years. |
|
| · | In the present theory, the greater pole of a metaparticle owes its imperceptibility to the fact of its much higher intensity. (Note similarity to invisible but perceptible "virtual particles" now familiar to physicists.) |
|
|
STEP
6: Metaparticle's
Alternate Spherical Form
|
||
| In response to external conditions, the metaparticle in its basic form can convert into a three-dimensional sphere. This happens when its disk-form begins rotating at slower velocity around a secondary axis perpendicular to the first. The electron or other particle having metaparticle structure can thereby alternate between basic disk and augmented spherical forms. | ||
| · | It has been repeatedly noted in the literature of physics that "spinning particles act like tiny gyroscopes". A large-scale gyroscope is observed to take on a temporary rotation on a second axis, which is called precession. |
|
| · | Computer simulations have consistently shown results closely reflecting electron behavior formerly termed "mysterious" when the spherical form was used. This augmented form appeared in earlier versions of the Metaparticle Theory sent to a number of prominent physicists in the eighties. |
|
| · | It was not until 2001 that the Brookhaven National Laboratory announced that precession had been observed in the rotation (then called spin) of a particle in the electron category, the muon. |
|
| · | The velocity ratio of the electron's primary rotation to its secondary must be correctly established (in the case of the metaparticle, it was discovered by trial and error). Otherwise the diagrams in the next section would be rendered by computer simulations in distorted patterns incommensurate with scientific findings. |
|
| · | The ratio that works turned out to be one to one-half, or two to one. | |
| · | It should be said that although steps l through 5 employ deductive reasoning developing "downward" from a wholly metaphysical premise not of our origination, Step 6 was a departure. It was derived after the fact -- after it became obvious that certain instances of mysterious electron behavior could not be explained by the basic metaparticle structure, but became immediately clear with introduction of the spherical or augmented form. |
|
| · | As a hypothesis only, we predict that Physics will eventually conclude that a major function of the spherical form is to enable the particle to remain static in space without a magnetic field.
|
|
